Lancet Series on ultra-processed foods and human health
21 November 2025
Background
The Lancet, a prestigious and high-impact scientific journal, has published this week a three-paper Series examining global dietary patterns and the health impacts the authors associate with what they call “ultra-processed foods”. The Series argues that these products are displacing traditional dietary patterns, contributing to poorer diet quality, and are associated with increased risk of a range of chronic diseases. The authors call for immediate public health action, including new global policies targeting production, marketing, and availability of these products. Importantly to the food industry, the papers call for:
- Strengthened front-of-pack labelling such as warning labelsincorporating markers of processing (e.g., additives, flavours)
- Marketing and advertising restrictions, especially targeted to children
- Taxes on UPF foods to fund subsidies for fresh foods
- Restrictions on sale in public settings (schools, hospitals)
The papers present a narrative framing large food companies as key drivers of dietary change and call for a global public health response similar to tobacco control.
AFGC action
The AFGC has consistently highlighted that the term “UPF” lacks scientific clarity and should not be used as the basis for policy or regulation. In response to the Lancet Series and related public commentary, we are:
- Monitoring developments closely, including media coverage, advocacy commentary, and any references in regulator or departmental communication.
- Assessing implications for current policy processes such as the Healthy Food Partnership, Health Star Rating review outcomes, and FSANZ policy work.
- Providing timely updates to members as reactions evolve domestically and internationally. We liaise regularly with international associations such as IFBA leveraging their insights and efforts on this matter.
The AFGC continues to support our members and the food sector in the important role packaged foods play in ensuring affordability, access, safety and year-round dietary diversity for Australian consumers.
Member action
Due to heightened media attention, companies may face consumer queries regarding “UPFs”.
It will be important for members to be aware that the classification system used in the Series is not a recognised regulatory framework and does not align with nutrient-based risk assessment or longstanding food safety processes.
Members are encouraged to familiarise themselves with information and resources available on the AFCG website:
Contact
Should you have any questions please contact me.
Dr Duncan Craig
Director Nutrition and Regulation
duncan.craig@afgc.org.au
